Income | $1,000,000 | Income | $100,000 | |||
Tax | Effective Tax Rate | Tax | Effective Tax Rate | |||
Average | 562,097 | 56.20% | Average | 36,311 | 36.30% | |
Median | 666,724 | 66.70% | Median | 33,200 | 33.20% | |
High | 914,820 | 91.50% | High | 70,320 | 70.30% | |
Low | 60,050 | 6.00% | Low | 2,550 | 2.60% | |
Year | Year | |||||
2010 | 320,308 | 32.00% | 2010 | 17,362 | 17.40% | |
2009 | 320,362 | 32.00% | 2009 | 17,375 | 17.40% | |
2008 | 321,575 | 32.20% | 2008 | 17,687 | 17.70% | |
2007 | 322,206 | 32.20% | 2007 | 17,847 | 17.80% | |
2006 | 323,250 | 32.30% | 2006 | 18,115 | 18.10% | |
2005 | 324,062 | 32.40% | 2005 | 18,330 | 18.30% | |
2004 | 324,643 | 32.50% | 2004 | 18,475 | 18.50% | |
2003 | 325,206 | 32.50% | 2003 | 18,620 | 18.60% | |
2002 | 356,759 | 35.70% | 2002 | 20,796 | 20.80% | |
2001 | 363,042 | 36.30% | 2001 | 21,850 | 21.90% | |
2000 | 368,667 | 36.90% | 2000 | 22,299 | 22.30% | |
1999 | 369,161 | 36.90% | 1999 | 22,403 | 22.40% | |
1998 | 369,603 | 37.00% | 1998 | 22,494 | 22.50% | |
1997 | 370,310 | 37.00% | 1997 | 22,656 | 22.70% | |
1996 | 371,000 | 37.10% | 1996 | 22,880 | 22.90% | |
1995 | 371,688 | 37.20% | 1995 | 23,102 | 23.10% | |
1994 | 372,304 | 37.20% | 1994 | 23,304 | 23.30% | |
1993 | 372,528 | 37.30% | 1993 | 23,528 | 23.50% | |
1992 | 302,751 | 30.30% | 1992 | 23,751 | 23.80% | |
1991 | 303,115 | 30.30% | 1991 | 24,115 | 24.10% | |
1990 | 280,000 | 28.00% | 1990 | 24,861 | 24.90% | |
1989 | 280,000 | 28.00% | 1989 | 25,234 | 25.20% | |
1988 | 280,000 | 28.00% | 1988 | 25,537 | 25.50% | |
1987 | 374,940 | 37.50% | 1987 | 28,440 | 28.40% | |
1986 | 479,928 | 48.00% | 1986 | 31,403 | 31.40% | |
1985 | 480,641 | 48.10% | 1985 | 31,886 | 31.90% | |
1984 | 481,400 | 48.10% | 1984 | 32,400 | 32.40% | |
1983 | 484,002 | 48.40% | 1983 | 34,190 | 34.20% | |
1982 | 487,449 | 48.70% | 1982 | 37,449 | 37.40% | |
1981 | 666,724 | 66.70% | 1981 | 41,998 | 42.00% | |
1980 | 666,724 | 66.70% | 1980 | 41,998 | 42.00% | |
1979 | 666,724 | 66.70% | 1979 | 41,998 | 42.00% | |
1978 | 668,740 | 66.90% | 1978 | 43,260 | 43.30% | |
1977 | 668,740 | 66.90% | 1977 | 43,260 | 43.30% | |
1976 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1976 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1975 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1975 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1974 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1974 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1973 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1973 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1972 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1972 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1971 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1971 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1970 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1970 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1969 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1969 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1968 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1968 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1967 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1967 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1966 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1966 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1965 | 670,980 | 67.10% | 1965 | 45,180 | 45.20% | |
1964 | 730,680 | 73.10% | 1964 | 47,880 | 47.90% | |
1963 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1963 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1962 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1962 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1961 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1961 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1960 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1960 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1959 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1959 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1958 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1958 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1957 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1957 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1956 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1956 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1955 | 859,640 | 86.00% | 1955 | 53,640 | 53.60% | |
1954 | 884,820 | 88.50% | 1954 | 67,320 | 67.30% | |
1953 | 896,716 | 89.70% | 1953 | 70,216 | 70.20% | |
1952 | 896,716 | 89.70% | 1952 | 70,216 | 70.20% | |
1951 | 885,296 | 88.50% | 1951 | 67,796 | 67.80% | |
1950 | 884,820 | 88.50% | 1950 | 67,320 | 67.30% | |
1949 | 884,820 | 88.50% | 1949 | 67,320 | 67.30% | |
1948 | 884,820 | 88.50% | 1948 | 67,320 | 67.30% | |
1947 | 884,820 | 88.50% | 1947 | 67,320 | 67.30% | |
1946 | 884,820 | 88.50% | 1946 | 67,320 | 67.30% | |
1945 | 914,820 | 91.50% | 1945 | 70,320 | 70.30% | |
1944 | 914,820 | 91.50% | 1944 | 70,320 | 70.30% | |
1943 | 855,140 | 85.50% | 1943 | 65,140 | 65.10% | |
1942 | 855,140 | 85.50% | 1942 | 65,140 | 65.10% | |
1941 | 733,780 | 73.40% | 1941 | 53,780 | 53.80% | |
1940 | 687,780 | 68.80% | 1940 | 40,780 | 40.80% | |
1939 | 681,000 | 68.10% | 1939 | 34,000 | 34.00% | |
1938 | 681,000 | 68.10% | 1938 | 34,000 | 34.00% | |
1937 | 681,000 | 68.10% | 1937 | 34,000 | 34.00% | |
1936 | 681,000 | 68.10% | 1936 | 34,000 | 34.00% | |
1935 | 573,000 | 57.30% | 1935 | 32,000 | 32.00% | |
1934 | 573,000 | 57.30% | 1934 | 32,000 | 32.00% | |
1933 | 571,300 | 57.10% | 1933 | 30,300 | 30.30% | |
1932 | 571,300 | 57.10% | 1932 | 30,300 | 30.30% | |
1931 | 241,123 | 24.10% | 1931 | 16,123 | 16.10% | |
1930 | 241,123 | 24.10% | 1930 | 16,123 | 16.10% | |
1929 | 241,123 | 24.10% | 1929 | 16,123 | 16.10% | |
1928 | 241,123 | 24.10% | 1928 | 16,123 | 16.10% | |
1927 | 241,123 | 24.10% | 1927 | 16,123 | 16.10% | |
1926 | 241,123 | 24.10% | 1926 | 16,123 | 16.10% | |
1925 | 241,440 | 24.10% | 1925 | 16,440 | 16.40% | |
1924 | 429,780 | 43.00% | 1924 | 22,780 | 22.80% | |
1923 | 495,600 | 49.60% | 1923 | 23,100 | 23.10% | |
1922 | 578,800 | 57.90% | 1922 | 30,300 | 30.30% | |
1921 | 693,350 | 69.30% | 1921 | 31,350 | 31.40% | |
1920 | 693,350 | 69.30% | 1920 | 31,350 | 31.40% | |
1919 | 693,350 | 69.30% | 1919 | 31,350 | 31.40% | |
1918 | 735,270 | 73.50% | 1918 | 35,270 | 35.30% | |
1917 | 475,260 | 47.50% | 1917 | 16,260 | 16.30% | |
1916 | 103,000 | 10.30% | 1916 | 4,000 | 4.00% | |
1915 | 60,050 | 6.00% | 1915 | 2,550 | 2.60% | |
1914 | 60,050 | 6.00% | 1914 | 2,550 | 2.60% | |
1913 | 60,050 | 6.00% | 1913 | 2,550 | 2.60% |
Americans need to address the national debt before it is too late.
Monday, March 29, 2010
Taxes On A Million ($1,000,000) and One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) Dollar Income - A Historical Perspective 1913 to 2010
Monday, March 15, 2010
Per Enrolle Medical Spending(1969 to 2008): Medicare and Private Insurance
The cost of providing older american with medical care is very high.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
CBO Definitions
Mandatory
Discretionary
- Social Security
- Income Security
- Medicare
- Medicaid
- Other Retirement
- Other Programs
Discretionary
- Defense
- International
- Domestic
CBO Budget Projections 2010 to 2020 as Percentage of Government Revenue and Total Outlays
More analysis of CBO projects for 2010 to 2020.
Here are the categories as percentage of revenue and total outlays:
Here are the categories as percentage of revenue and total outlays:
CBO Budget Projections from 2010 to 2020 on a Per Capita and Adjusted for Inflation Basis
The table below projects from 2010 to 2020 how much each person in America (per capita, the average per person):
Projected Budget Data - http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/112xx/doc11231/budgetprojections.xls
Projected Cost Price Index (CPI) - http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/economicprojections.xls
US Population - http://www.census.gov/population/www/popclockus.html
The tables are:
- should pay toward government revenue (total government revenue which includes: personal income tax, corporate income tax, other taxes and fees)
- how much government is spending: non-discretionary, discretionary and net interests
- annual fiscal debt
- national debt
- gross domestic product (GDP): market value of all final goods and services made within the borders of a country in a year
Projected Budget Data - http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/112xx/doc11231/budgetprojections.xls
Projected Cost Price Index (CPI) - http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/economicprojections.xls
US Population - http://www.census.gov/population/www/popclockus.html
The tables are:
- Assumptions: Population increase 1% per year.
- Per Person in Dollars
- Per Person in Constant Dollars (2009)
- Projected in Current Dollars
- Projected in 2009 Dollars (constant)
- Increase from 2010 to 2020
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Reducing Health Care Spending
There is only two ways to reduce the spending on national health care:
How do you reduce quantity of
- Reduce prices of services, procedures and medicine
- Reduce quantity of services, procedures and medicine
- services
- procedures
- medicine
How do you reduce quantity of
- services
- procedures
- medicine
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)